Entitlements
Just in case you didn't catch all the details in the 2000-plus pages of the "free health care" offer.
Nancy Pelosi was right about one thing:
“We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it …”
More legible here.

The truth is that the clock is ticking on the USA getting its fiscal house in order. The truth is that very few politicians are willing to admit this. The truth is that Florida Republican senate candidate Marco Rubio is one of those rare politicians, as this recent exchange between Rubio and reporter Chris Wallace makes clear:
RUBIO: Social Security, whether we want it to or not, in its current form cannot survive and will not exist for us. In fact, just this week we received the news that for the first time Social Security is now paying out more in benefits than it's taking in. That was something that was supposed to happen in 2016. It's now happening in 2010.
WALLACE: So, direct question...
RUBIO: Absolutely.
WALLACE: ... would you raise...
RUBIO: Yes.
WALLACE: ... the retirement age?
RUBIO: I think that has to be on the table. That's got to be part of the solution, the retirement age gradually increases for people of my generation. I think it's got to be part of...
WALLACE: Would you change cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security?
RUBIO: I think all of that has to be on the table, including the way we index increases in cost of living. All of these issues have to be on the table. They have to be options that I would be open to. They are included in the Ryan roadmap. I think it's the right approach to Social Security reform.
George Will welcomes Rubio's clarity:
By the time the baby boomers have retired in 2030, the median age of the American population will be close to that of today's population of Florida, the retirees' haven that is Heaven's antechamber. The 38-year-old Rubio's responsible answer to a serious question gives the nation a glimpse of a rarity — a brave approach to the welfare state's inevitable politics of gerontocracy.




