Immigration
Surprise — not. The mayor of San Francisco (Sanctuary City = welcome mat magnet for illegal immigrants) doesn't like Arizona's get-tough approach to dealing with foreign nationals illegally present in the United States:
"What happened in Arizona is ... un-American," the mayor said. "The idea that people, based on their race or ethnicity, can be pulled over or stopped and someone asks for their papers reminds me of something I read ... happening overseas."
The new law makes no such provision. Mayor Gavin Newsom knows, or should know, the law explicitly forbids any form of racial/ethnic profiling. Arizona police are simply authorized to ascertain the immigration status of anyone they reasonably suspect is in the state illegally. So: who might qualify as a reasonable suspect, and on what grounds? Try individuals gathered in Home Depot parking lots, or at gas stations or other locations known to be frequented by persons — regardless of race or ethnicity — seeking work as day laborers. If such persons flee approaching uniformed police officers, would it not be a safe guess that they might be candidates for reasonable suspicion? Persons who run at the mere sight of a cop might have blond hair and blue eyes and hail from Stockholm, or maybe, just perhaps, they crossed the U.S. border under cover of darkness from Mexico. Simply stated, the Arizona law asserts concurrent jurisdiction by making being in the country illegally an offense, as it is already an offense at the federal level.
Meanwhile, San Francisco City Supervisor David Campos, a proud open-borders advocate, declares: "There are consequences when you target a whole people." He's right about that, but not for the reasons he thinks. The "whole people" being targeted are people present in the United States illegally. If congressional Democrats are keen to champion their cause in the November elections — along with Obamacare, Cap and Trade, middle class tax increases, and the stunning growth of federal spending — allow me to quote Mr. Obama: "Bring it."
If the Feds refuse to stem the flow of illegal immigration — and clearly Obama's not trying — it's inevitable the states most affected will do what they can. The Wall Street Journal:
Arizona lawmakers on Tuesday passed one of the toughest pieces of immigration-enforcement legislation in the country, which would make it a violation of state law to be in the U.S. without proper documentation.
It would also grant police the power to stop and verify the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being illegal.
Under the measure, passed Tuesday by Arizona's lower house, after being passed earlier by the state Senate, foreign nationals are required to carry proof of legal residency.
If the Feds refuse to stem the flow of illegal immigration — and clearly Obama's not trying — it's inevitable the states most affected will do what they can.
Guess who's not happy? The open-borders crowd:
"The objective is to make life miserable for immigrants so that they leave the state," said Chris Newman, general counsel for the Los Angeles-based National Day Laborer Organizing Network.
Now there's a concept: unauthorized foreign nationals leaving. If enough states get tough, "leaving" should begin to look like: heading south of the border. Ya think?
If Arizona's governor signs the bill, look for some activist judge to rule it unconstitutional on the premise that immigration is the province of the federal government not the states. (That's what happened to Proposition 187 in California.) If that happens, look for growing demand for a strict national bill — which won't be forthcoming, of course. So the real battleground will be this fall, at the ballot box, in state after state.




