Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton's been wagging his finger at us again, this time in a pathetic attempt to link the Tea Party movement to extremist violence. Not the first time he's tried to exploit the Oklahoma City bombing for political advantage, as Byron York reminds us:
Clinton was in deep political trouble in April 1995. Six months earlier, voters had resoundingly rejected Democrats in the 1994 mid-term elections, giving the GOP control of both House and Senate. Polls showed the public viewed Clinton as weak, incompetent and ineffective. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and his GOP forces seized the initiative on virtually every significant issue, while Clinton appeared to be politically dead. The worst moment may have come on April 18, the day before the bombing, when Clinton plaintively told reporters, "The president is still relevant here."
And then came the explosion at the Murrah Federal Building. In addition to seeing a criminal act and human loss, Clinton and Morris saw opportunity. If the White House could tie Gingrich, congressional Republicans and conservative voices like Rush Limbaugh to the attack, then Clinton might gain the edge in the fight against the GOP.
Clinton pretty much accomplished his goal, thanks to polling and strategic advice from Dick Morris. Thus the White House regained the upper hand over congressional Republicans on a series of policy initiatives. Not surprisingly, Clinton now purports to view demonization of opponents as, well, something close to demonic — even as he proceeds (naturally) to demonize the Tea Party this past week. Will the strategy succeed? Don't count on it. For one thing, Rasmussen shows thirty-five percent (35%) of mainstream voters viewing themselves as Tea Party members. Asking four-fifths of Americans who say they don't trust Washington to compare themselves with Timothy McVeigh is a stretch. With Republican leaders refusing to get rattled (as they did in 1995) by the conservatives-as-extremists bromide, Clinton's rhetoric is more likely to fall flat.
Meanwhile, Tunku Varadarajan describes the true makeup of the movement Clinton purports to find so ominous:
...the Tea Partiers are not a bilious, lunatic, unschooled, racist rabble out to sabotage our first African-American president, but are, instead, passionate, educated, middle-aged, middle-class and relatively prosperous critics of the Obama administration.
Still and all: Nice try, Bill. Special thanks for the reminder that "words really do matter." Priceless.




