gototopgototop
" The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. "
—Margaret Thatcher


keithbeach2

…that measures its sanity by the percentage of its people who know they are free. People with unshakeable clarity that their most fundamental rights — to think for themselves and speak their minds without fear of jail, to form voluntary associations of their choosing, to enjoy the fruits of their labor, to acquire private property and protect it at gunpoint if necessary — are not given by government, or society, or any person.

A nation whose vitality and resilience depend on individuals who consider those rights intrinsic to their very being: the spiritual equivalent of DNA. Such that when any aspect of the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness is assaulted — they feel it like a punch in the gut. Patriotism gets personal. Conversations begin around the office water cooler, over back yard fences, at diners, gas stations and softball fields. In this way diverse people find out they’ve got something crucial in common. Born free and mean to stay that way.

America’s Founders were that kind of people. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison risked the gallows when they declared government has no power except those voluntarily granted it by the people. When they insisted that the fundamental duty of government is to secure (read: safeguard) our inherent and “unalienable” natural rights. They brought forth a republic with the Constitution of the United States as supreme law of the land. No better instrument has been devised for protecting personal liberty by establishing a limited and defined role for government.

Now this great achievement is threatened by a worldview that contradicts the principles of America’s Founding at every turn. By an ideology that promotes the psychology of victimization and rage against imaginary villains, infantile claims to entitlement and compensation, primitive feelings of envy and inferiority. Marxist in fact though seldom in name, this movement demands guaranteed rewards regardless of talent, skill, motivation or effort. This militant crusade vows to meet the needs of “The People” from cradle to grave, betting that a majority can be seduced to support candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury.

Fortunately the politics of perennial preschool is free — or seems so — only at first. Tuition day eventually comes. The same government that offers to absolve us from responsibility for our lives gets to determine what we can own, eat and drive; how we manage our businesses; how much of our money we can keep; the number of guns — if any — they will let us own; what we are allowed to say.  Even what we are permitted to think (thanks to the advent of “hate crimes”).

Good news: more and more Americans are figuring out that annexing the core functions of adulthood to the state involves unacceptable trade-offs. A recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey found that 56 percent of Americans believe that the government has become so powerful it constitutes an immediate threat to the freedom and rights of citizens. When only 21 percent of Americans say that Washington operates with the consent of the governed, we face an alarming crisis.

And a remarkable opportunity.

The Founders knew it was up to each successive generation to keep the Spirit of 1776 alive. “Don’t blow it.” That’s what I imagine the 56 signers of the Declaration Of Independence telling us. Their mission was to create a government where the primacy of constitutional authority is basic to liberty, opportunity, prosperity and the social contract. Where personal responsibility, voluntary cooperation, fiscal integrity and abiding respect for life all are crucial to the foundation of culture.

A society where the first requisite of a good citizen, in Theodore Roosevelt’s words, “is that he shall be able and willing to pull his own weight.” A country that supports America’s national interest in advancing freedom and opposing tyranny in the world, and prudently considers what we can and should do to that end.

That’s also the mission of Sane Nation. Welcome.

Justice

Police Must Stop Silent Running

Keith Thompson Friday, 14 May 2010 13:59

"Silent running" is a term for the phenomenon of police officers driving at often fantastic speeds with all their lights and sirens shut off. "Utter mindless negligent irresponsibility" is a better term.

A beautiful young woman named Devin Peteslski died last October 18 when her car was rammed by an LAPD police cruiser running silent. Officers claimed they were driving within the speed limit, but subsequent investigation (thanks to the black box speed recorder aboard the police vehicle) indicates the cruiser accelerated to at least 80 MPH just before broadsiding Devin's car. Not only did LAPD lie about their speed; they had the audacity to say they smelled alcohol on Devin's breath. In fact, toxicology tests postmortem indicated no presence of alcohol. In further fact, at the time of her death 25-year-old Devin was driving home from working her shift as a drug and alcohol abuse counselor. Devin worked tirelessly to help other young people conquer their addictions, as she had done years earlier. Shame on the LAPD for their negligence and criminal deceit. The most recent facts of this case are here.

This touches me personally. I didn't know Devin but her father is a friend. He and his family have suffered a grievous loss. A wrongful death lawsuit is proceeding, and given the egregious police misconduct it's hard to imagine the City of Los Angeles allowing a jury to hear this case. But every parent knows no amount of money can compensate for the horrific wrongful death of a child. Devin was a beautiful and deeply caring young woman who was committed to alleviating the suffering of others. Her renewed life of sobriety and personal responsibility was gorgeous to behold, by the accounts of all who knew her.

Silent running — sometimes known as "Code 2 High" — is simply unacceptable. The idea of police officers driving at fantastic speeds so as to be undetectable to other drivers and pedestrians lacks any reasonable justification as a law enforcement strategy. If it is necessary to drive that fast to apprehend a suspect, odds are the suspect knows he's being chased; it's not as if police display of lights and sirens will hinder the odds of successful capture. This insanity must stop now in every town and every city where police officers practice it. If a civilian driver had taken an innocent life in this reckless manner, the DA would have filed criminal charges within days and LAPD officers would surely testify as to the driver's liability.

Just so we're clear. My comments here reflect no lack of respect for the average cop on the beat. I have watched police officers step into dangerous situations involving crowd control and volatile emotions. I'm keenly aware that our men and women in blue put their lives on the line every day. Police officers who do their duty with honor and utmost competence enjoy my utter respect and admiration. To drive manically on public thoroughfares and place the public gravely at risk is dereliction of duty.

In this instance, the line distinguishing duty from dereliction is neither thin nor blue. The line is bright and bold. Those who crossed it must be held fully to account.