gototopgototop
" The theory that praise, self-esteem and accomplishment increase in tandem is false. Children incessantly praised for their intelligence (often by parents who are really praising themselves) often underrate the importance of effort. "
—George Will


keithbeach2

…that measures its sanity by the percentage of its people who know they are free. People with unshakeable clarity that their most fundamental rights — to think for themselves and speak their minds without fear of jail, to form voluntary associations of their choosing, to enjoy the fruits of their labor, to acquire private property and protect it at gunpoint if necessary — are not given by government, or society, or any person.

A nation whose vitality and resilience depend on individuals who consider those rights intrinsic to their very being: the spiritual equivalent of DNA. Such that when any aspect of the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness is assaulted — they feel it like a punch in the gut. Patriotism gets personal. Conversations begin around the office water cooler, over back yard fences, at diners, gas stations and softball fields. In this way diverse people find out they’ve got something crucial in common. Born free and mean to stay that way.

America’s Founders were that kind of people. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison risked the gallows when they declared government has no power except those voluntarily granted it by the people. When they insisted that the fundamental duty of government is to secure (read: safeguard) our inherent and “unalienable” natural rights. They brought forth a republic with the Constitution of the United States as supreme law of the land. No better instrument has been devised for protecting personal liberty by establishing a limited and defined role for government.

Now this great achievement is threatened by a worldview that contradicts the principles of America’s Founding at every turn. By an ideology that promotes the psychology of victimization and rage against imaginary villains, infantile claims to entitlement and compensation, primitive feelings of envy and inferiority. Marxist in fact though seldom in name, this movement demands guaranteed rewards regardless of talent, skill, motivation or effort. This militant crusade vows to meet the needs of “The People” from cradle to grave, betting that a majority can be seduced to support candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury.

Fortunately the politics of perennial preschool is free — or seems so — only at first. Tuition day eventually comes. The same government that offers to absolve us from responsibility for our lives gets to determine what we can own, eat and drive; how we manage our businesses; how much of our money we can keep; the number of guns — if any — they will let us own; what we are allowed to say.  Even what we are permitted to think (thanks to the advent of “hate crimes”).

Good news: more and more Americans are figuring out that annexing the core functions of adulthood to the state involves unacceptable trade-offs. A recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey found that 56 percent of Americans believe that the government has become so powerful it constitutes an immediate threat to the freedom and rights of citizens. When only 21 percent of Americans say that Washington operates with the consent of the governed, we face an alarming crisis.

And a remarkable opportunity.

The Founders knew it was up to each successive generation to keep the Spirit of 1776 alive. “Don’t blow it.” That’s what I imagine the 56 signers of the Declaration Of Independence telling us. Their mission was to create a government where the primacy of constitutional authority is basic to liberty, opportunity, prosperity and the social contract. Where personal responsibility, voluntary cooperation, fiscal integrity and abiding respect for life all are crucial to the foundation of culture.

A society where the first requisite of a good citizen, in Theodore Roosevelt’s words, “is that he shall be able and willing to pull his own weight.” A country that supports America’s national interest in advancing freedom and opposing tyranny in the world, and prudently considers what we can and should do to that end.

That’s also the mission of Sane Nation. Welcome.

Facebook

Let's Get Real About Facebook

Keith Thompson Friday, 21 May 2010 10:35

The hue and cry continues about Facebook's new privacy policies. Some users say it should be easier to opt out of particular options. Some say users should be able to choose for themselves whether to opt in. One bunch believes Facebook users need a "bill of rights." Here's an example of the hysteria:

What started out as fun has become downright scary. A disturbing string of deceptive policy changes, glitches and holes leave us wondering if the titans of social media truly care about user privacy and control. They collect terabytes of our personal information - yet they are treating it as if it's theirs alone.

Facebook users of the world, listen up. You chose to join; nobody put a gun to your head. And you signed a "user agreement" consenting to Facebook's rules and regulations. Each time Facebook revises that agreement, you give your consent in order to continue to sign in to your Facebook account.

If you don't like Facebook's new changes, it takes 5 minutes to opt out while continuing as a member. Here's how. Or, if you are so deeply offended by Facebook's privacy policies that you cannot in good conscience remain a Facebook user, you can easily suspend or even cancel your account altogether. It will take you 30 seconds.

As for a bill of rights for social networking: get a life. Facebook use is not a basic human right. It's an entirely optional activity that you have the right to continue if you choose to follow Facebook's rules of the road. Facebook has the right to adopt privacy policies consistent with relevant legal statutes. Facebook is not allowed to commit fraud; and no, Facebook's change of policy regarding your privacy is not fraudulent.

In any voluntary domain of activity, sometimes the rules of the road change on the road you've been traveling. When that happens, you can choose to follow the rules for that existing road, or you can turn onto a new road and explore some new possibilities. If you enjoy social networking but no longer like Facebook, do what Facebook's founders did: create a social networking site. A place for whiners to go online and connect with fellow whiners. Really, it will be good to have all you people in one vast, isolated zone of your very own.