Abortion
"There's A Little Person Living Inside You. Have A Look."
Keith Thompson Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:23Oklahoma's legislature has overriden Gov. Brad Henry's veto of two abortion bills, one requiring pregnant women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of the fetus before getting an abortion. "The person who performs the ultrasound must describe the dimensions of the fetus, whether arms, legs and internal organs are visible and whether the physician can detect cardiac activity. He or she must also turn a screen depicting the images toward the woman so she can see them" (Tim Talley, Associated Press).
Outraged pro-abortion activist Jennifer Mondino says the ultrasound requirement intrudes upon a patient's privacy. "The constitutional issues are very serious," she adds.
Agreed: serious constitutional issues here. Let's figure this out.
First things first. Neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution that enshrines its core ideas establishes a two-tiered legal policy on human beings defining a superior class as persons with rights and an inferior class without rights. Humans per se are understood as possessed of inherent rights, such as the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. The Fourth Amendment starts with: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons." The right not to be summarily executed at any stage of life might be considered a reasonable extension of this intrinsic right.
OK, let's move on to a biological fact. The human embryonic organism formed at fertilization is not a potential or a possible human being, but rather an an actual human being with the potential to grow bigger and develop its capacities. Which leaves a crucial question not yet answered: Whose life are we talking about? Or more to the point: When abortion is the subject, how many lives are in play? (Hint: more than one. Extra credit if it occurs to you that an ultrasound image offers a glimpse of the most vulnerable one. This is noted because not everybody cares about that — by their own words, Sen. Barbara Boxer and Sen. Russ Feingold among them.)
Consider: During a Senate debate a while back, Sen. Rick Santorum tried to get Sen. Boxer to clarify at what point during a late-term abortion it would be permissable to kill the newborn. This exchange actually took place on the floor of the U.S. Senate:
Boxer: You asked me a question, in essence, when the baby is born.
Santorum: I am asking you again. Can you answer that?
Boxer: I will answer the question when the baby is born. The baby is born when the baby is outside the mother's body. The baby is born.
Santorum: I am not going to put words in your mouth –
Boxer: I hope not.
Santorum: But, again, what you are suggesting is if the baby's toe is inside the mother, you can, in fact, kill that baby.
Boxer: Absolutely not.
Santorum: OK. So if the baby's toe is in, you can't kill the baby. How about if the baby's foot is in?
Boxer: You are the one who is making these statements.
Santorum: We are trying to draw a line here.
Boxer: I am not answering these questions! I am not answering these questions.
Thus Sen. Boxer asserted her right to keep her views private as to the precise moment, during an actual live birth which started out as an intended abortion, it is OK to execute the newborn. (Just so we're clear: One toe out ... the baby stands a good chance of making it to an wetnurse, and eventually to adoptive parents.) Sen. Feingold had his own thoughts on the privacy issue:
Santorum: "If that baby were delivered breech style and everything was delivered except for the head, and for some reason that that baby's head would slip out - that the baby was completely delivered - would it then still be up to the doctor and the mother to decide?"
Feingold: "The standard of saying it has to be a determination, by a doctor, of health of the mother, is a sufficient standard that would apply to that situation."
Santorum: "That doesn't answer the question. Let's assume the head is accidentally delivered. Would you allow the doctor to kill the baby?"
Feingold: "That is a question that should be answered by a doctor, and by the woman who received the advice from the doctor."
Sometimes words really do speak for themselves.




